A question for any Canon IS user, if you don't mind me asking: do you use glasses while using the binoculars? I'm trying to get used to these but during the day the using comfort is soooooo poor, really appalling, it makes using them a bit of a pain which spoils the view or any optical advantage these might provide.

If you are Wedding Album Designer Then PSD files published here which you can use for creating 12X36 sizes for any album designs such as Wedding Album Design, Karizma Album Design, Photo Album Design, Marriage Album Design, Shadi Album Design, Canvera Album Design, Engagement Album Design, and Etc. A meager 2 year warranty and the possibility that these won't be able to be repaired like a quality conventional binocular In terms of the astigmatism and CA, having the correct diaopter adjustment is vital. I find my unit is very sensitive to that. So it’s worth spending the time to dial it in just right. I don’t think the aberrations completely go away on the brightest objects but it improves a lot. This is annoying when you’re sharing them or vacillating between using them with or without glasses on, but it is what it is.The onboard anti-shake system, which employs a combination of gyro sensors and a microprocessor, is claimed to be so reliable that a steady view is provided even from a moving vehicle, while the batteries required for it to work last up to nine hours of use. On that note for those of you that have the 12x36iii can you comment on if the slight focus drift I noticed during stabilization is normal?If not I may need to return them.

I like the ergonomics of the 12x36iii much better, the single button is intuitive to activate while being able to focus with the same hand with or without gloves, the eyecups work pretty well for my narrow spaced eyes, Usually I have to close binoculars basically as far as they go to get the right spacing and some models won't even go narrow enough. They feel a bit lighter in the hand at 24oz.There appears to be no sealing at all on the battery door. I don't wear glasses but to me they seem like when the eyecups are rolled down it may still be too close for glasses wearers. One funny thing: the right eyecup on my 12x36 IS III (the one controlling the dioptre setting) moves at the slightest input; for example, while taking them out of the case. It even moves during a single using session, which means some times I have to readjust. The one on the 10x30, on the other hand, stays in place without much problem. This is puzzling since both look identical, but one is clearly tighter. Price relativities between the various models are bit different here in Australia. When available, the 12x32 is almost twice as expensive as the 12x36. The price of the latter is much the same here as with b&h (FX fluctuations notwithstanding). So in the full context of a purchasing decision here in OZ I feel it is hands down in favour of the 12x36iii. In contrast, when I first looked through the 32mm series binoculars my overwhelming feeling was “why bother?” And I might add that with an ipd of 72mm I don’t mind the eyecups on this series. So that ironically enough is not an issue for me. My negativity towards the 32s centres on a feeling that they don’t seem to add anything over the 10x30/12x36 series, other than one touch activation. And compared to the 10x42L ( which is almost same price here in OZ) are a disappointing retrograde step.I‘m still torn between admiration and disappointment. Handheld stable views at 18x in a compact and quite light instrument is stunning and rewarding. The focus drift is a bit annoying but over longer sessions I seem to be able to concentrate on the detail that’s there in the sharper moments. As indicated in the binocular name, Canon’s sales pitch is that these binos feature its range-topping ‘L’ grade optical quality – denoted by a tell-tale red ring– matched to a large 42mm sized objective lens.